Alternative Histories - An Answer to the Question "What If?"
Alternative histories are essentially
stories that develop when historians ask “what
if?” They are fictional works created on the
premise of a change in the events of our past. Although
some of these works can take a rather imaginative
approach, most are based on a strong framework of
historical fact. Thus, alternative histories offer
a unique glimpse of what could have happened if humankind
had taken a slightly different course.
Alternate histories have been fascinating
people for centuries. In fact, the first known account
of a variation on the past was written approximately
two thousand years ago by Titus Livy, a Roman historian.
In his work History of Rome from its Foundation, Livy
speculates on what would have happened if Alexander
the Great had lived longer and moved his armies westward
to attack Rome. In this brief speculative account,
which composes a mere section of one out of 142 books,
Livy argues that the Romans would have been able to
defeat Alexander the Great.
Perhaps the first modern alternate
history was composed in France in the early 19th century
by Louis Geoffroy. Geoffroy wrote a compelling tale
of what could have happened if Napoleon had succeeded
in his Russian campaign and continued his global conquests.
In this version, titled History of the Universal Monarchy:
Napoleon and the Conquest of the World, Napoleon Bonaparte
eventually unifies the world and rules as an enlightened
despot. Ultimately, Geoffroy tells of a utopian society
under Napoleon. Other writers of this period also
created utopian alternate histories. For example,
in 1895 Englishman Castello Holford composed a variation
on the settlement of Virginia. In his version, a reef
of gold is found and the settlers use the wealth to
build a perfect society in the New World.
By the twentieth century, the genre
of alternate history had undergone a notable change.
Rather than taking a utopian spin, many authors began
composing “dystopian” stories. These works
depict a world that is completely under the authority
of an authoritarian regime. Many focus on what would
have happened if the Allies had not been victorious
during World War II. Thus, in The Man in the High
Castle, Philip K Dick shows what the United States
might have been like had they surrendered to Nazi
Germany and the Empire of Japan. Similarly, George
Orwell’s classic text 1984 depicts a society
completely overtaken by totalitarian regimes after
World War II. In this version, the Second World War
gave birth to three authoritarian super-states controlled
by Britain, Russia, and China / Japan.
For the last several decades, there
has been a growing trend to merge alternate history
with science fiction. In many of these works, time-travel
is an underlying theme. Historical figures and events
are dragged across space and time to show interesting
historical possibilities. One early example of this
style was composed in 1923 by H.G. Wells. In his work,
Men Like Gods, Wells sends his characters to an alternative
timeline showing an oddly utopian Britain. In another
variation on this theme, Murray Leinster sends his
protagonists through several alternate timelines in
his short work Sidewise in Time. More recently, Arthur
C. Clark and Stephen Baxter co-authored Time’s
Eye, a novel where the world is torn apart and reassembled
with pieces from different eras. This ultimately results
in one of the most interesting military matchups in
alternative history; Alexander the Great versus Genghis
Khan.
Alternate histories shine an interesting
light on the past. They tell the story of how our
world could have been if even the smallest change
had been made to the historical record. When properly
researched and accurately written, these works can
be startlingly realistic. While it is impossible to
know how accurate an alternative history account truly
is, they ultimately provide an interesting commentary
on the world we know.
|